Argueing for the Legalization of same-sex marriages in Illinois Essay

Argueing for the Legalization of same-sex marriages in Illinois - Essay Example to make decisions for their partner who is being hospitalized, have the right to sue on their partner’s behalf and cannot be forced to testify against them in court. Married couples also pay less in taxes and receive many other social and financial benefits. But because gay couples are legally prevented from marrying, they are excluded from receiving the same considerations that married heterosexual couples enjoy (Eagle, 2006). This paper will more closely examine the benefits denied gay couples as well as the political and legal implications involved with the issue. It will conclude with a discussion involving one of the main non-religious based reasons that those who oppose gay marriage espouse, the affect of this type of living arrangement on the children of the relationship. The argument proposed by the opponents of gay marriage is that the U.S. Constitution guarantees a republican form of government in which elected officials are intended to set social policy for the nation. Legislators do this by representing their constituent’s moral views when drafting laws. Because the Constitution bars the intertwining of state and religion, the only method of ensuring that moral and ethical codes are enforced throughout society is through acts of legislation. In fact, lawmakers draft laws that address moral issues constantly and not just in high profile matters such as abortion, pornography and gay rights. When courts determine morality issues, they counteract legislation meant to protect the moral fabric of society and break down the constitutionally guaranteed separation of powers within the government. â€Å"When judges erode the power of the people’s representatives to set society’s moral compass, they likewise undercut the authority of parents, schools, and other community groups to set the standards they would like to see their children and fellow citizens live by. Indeed, it is a frontal assault on community values writ large† (Raul,

Weekly journal Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Weekly journal - Assignment Example The ad is selling a beer called Guinness. The ad is communicating the fact that even a dog can round up people to enjoy Guinness together. It is trying to communicate the fact that even a dog knows that people are better off enjoying Guinness together than going to the couch to watch a game, to the club to see girls dancing or to the Indian restaurant for food. The fact that a dog can be used to round up people to come and enjoy beer together is what drew me to the advertisement. There was also a crowd that watched as the dog rounded up people to the bar. This made the advertisement interesting and funny. I think that the ad was effective towards persuading people to choose the â€Å"Guinness† brand and not any other. The fact that the ad depicted that even a dog know the right beer that people should be taking was an effective way of making people believe in the brand. I think that the brand has stood the test of time since it has been in existence for very many years. I would definitely buy the product if I had the money and needed beer. This is because the product has been in existence for very many years. This shows that it is loved by many people. It must, therefore, have an edge over similar